ASE 2025 Annual Conference

A recent Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) evidence review of metacognition and self-regulated learning (Muijs & Bokhove, 2020) suggests that enabling learners to apply metacognitive strategies in the classroom can have a high impact on learning outcomes. The summary guidance report (https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/guidance-reports/metacognition) identifies seven recommendations and these include setting an appropriate level of challenge and promoting metacognitive talk between learners during whole class dialogue.

Metacognition and cognitive conflict are two of the key pedagogical pillars that underpin the seminal research into Cognitive Acceleration, established in 1981 by Michael Shayer, Philip Adey and Carolyn Yates at King's College, London. In this research, metacognition is defined as a learner’s ability to ‘think about their thinking’. The professional learning programme and teaching resources, arising from this work, translated this research into a series of classroom lessons, initially within the context of secondary science (CASE). Since its inception, the theoretical principles of Cognitive Acceleration have been applied across different age phases (5-11 years) and curriculum subjects (e.g. maths CAME) and English (LTE)). Collectively, these learning, teaching and professional development resources provide practical classroom approaches aimed at enabling learners to develop their ability to think and think about their thinking.

The EEF review of metacognition and self-regulated learning draws attention to understanding the differences between developing a learner’s knowledge of how they think, the strategies they employ to achieve this and their ability to select, regulate and evaluate the effectiveness of using different strategies. Findings within this review also suggest that teaching metacognitive and self-regulated strategies discretely, outside of the curriculum as stand-alone ‘thinking lessons’ is less effective and calls for teachers to identify subject specific teaching opportunities where metacognitive strategies can be applied appropriately within curriculum subjects.
In this interactive workshop, a team of current CA tutors and those involved in the research will draw from these materials to offer some classroom strategies (and insights) that will support you in enabling learners to think about their thinking in science in today's classroom. This session will include presentation, interaction and professional reflection . We will revisit the theory behind Cognitive Acceleration and model teaching approaches that bring this theory to life in a science classroom. Within the context of both secondary and primary science, this session will support you to consider:

How do I establish a learning environment that promotes a culture of thinking and curiosity?
How can I introduce an appropriate level of collaborative challenge in my science lessons?
How might I employ classroom dialogue (metacognitive talk) to facilitate challenge (and conflict) and metacognition in my science lessons?