ASE 2025 Annual Conference

Metacognition is a hugely powerful pedagogy. In fact, it is the highest rated impact that EEF have researched. Beyond this, it is also a key part of ITT and high-quality CPD, as defined by OFSTED. However, it is quite a complex theory, and often ignored by schools and teachers alike.

This session will look to address these difficulties, by presenting a number of high-quality metacognitive strategies which can be introduced quickly and successfully into the STEM classroom.

These strategies build from work undertaken with OUP, around the ideas of planning, monitoring and evaluation. No teacher will leave this session without new or improved strategies that they can instantly introduce into their classroom.

IRIS has supported over 7,700 students across 10% of UK secondary schools to carry out real research, contributing to knowledge today and solving the problems of tomorrow. We’ve seen how teachers and schools can developing a culture of Research & Innovation and how it transforms students’ experience of and relationship with STEM.

Do you want to inspire your students to pursue STEM careers and make a positive impact on the world? Do you want to learn how to foster a culture of research and innovation in your school that engages learners of all abilities and backgrounds? If so, join us for this session where we will share what we’ve learnt from our work and research. You will also get practical tips and resources on how to start your own research and innovation journey.

It may seem obvious but revising/studying for an exam improves student outcomes on the exam. However, how students revise and the strategies they use can have a big influence on these outcomes. In recent years, evidence drawn from cognitive psychology has given teachers a much better insight and understanding of effective teaching and study strategies. However, the students may not be utilising these strategies when undertaking independent study.

In this session we will explore the evidence base into effective revision strategies and present findings from our recent study that focussed on developing effective revision strategies for GCSE science. Findings suggest that a sequenced approach to revision is helpful and that effective techniques need to be taught and embedded into the curriculum.

A recent Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) evidence review of metacognition and self-regulated learning (Muijs & Bokhove, 2020) suggests that enabling learners to apply metacognitive strategies in the classroom can have a high impact on learning outcomes. The summary guidance report (https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/guidance-reports/metacognition) identifies seven recommendations and these include setting an appropriate level of challenge and promoting metacognitive talk between learners during whole class dialogue.

Metacognition and cognitive conflict are two of the key pedagogical pillars that underpin the seminal research into Cognitive Acceleration, established in 1981 by Michael Shayer, Philip Adey and Carolyn Yates at King's College, London. In this research, metacognition is defined as a learner’s ability to ‘think about their thinking’. The professional learning programme and teaching resources, arising from this work, translated this research into a series of classroom lessons, initially within the context of secondary science (CASE). Since its inception, the theoretical principles of Cognitive Acceleration have been applied across different age phases (5-11 years) and curriculum subjects (e.g. maths CAME) and English (LTE)). Collectively, these learning, teaching and professional development resources provide practical classroom approaches aimed at enabling learners to develop their ability to think and think about their thinking.

The EEF review of metacognition and self-regulated learning draws attention to understanding the differences between developing a learner’s knowledge of how they think, the strategies they employ to achieve this and their ability to select, regulate and evaluate the effectiveness of using different strategies. Findings within this review also suggest that teaching metacognitive and self-regulated strategies discretely, outside of the curriculum as stand-alone ‘thinking lessons’ is less effective and calls for teachers to identify subject specific teaching opportunities where metacognitive strategies can be applied appropriately within curriculum subjects.
In this interactive workshop, a team of current CA tutors and those involved in the research will draw from these materials to offer some classroom strategies (and insights) that will support you in enabling learners to think about their thinking in science in today's classroom. This session will include presentation, interaction and professional reflection . We will revisit the theory behind Cognitive Acceleration and model teaching approaches that bring this theory to life in a science classroom. Within the context of both secondary and primary science, this session will support you to consider:

How do I establish a learning environment that promotes a culture of thinking and curiosity?
How can I introduce an appropriate level of collaborative challenge in my science lessons?
How might I employ classroom dialogue (metacognitive talk) to facilitate challenge (and conflict) and metacognition in my science lessons?

In recent years, education in England has seen a move towards ‘evidenced-based’ practice with the Department for Education privileging ideas and practice drawn from cognitive science.  

An area that has gained significant interest is that of ‘retrieval practice’. On the face of it, retrieval practice appears to be an intuitive and easy to implement strategy for a teacher, as it requires students to retrieve (remember) information from their long-term memory, rather than passively restudy it. The act of deliberately retrieving information then improves the retention and later retrieval of that information, which is often referred to as the ‘testing effect’.

Despite there being strong evidence that retrieval practice supports learning, there are a number of issues that teachers should be aware of when translating the research into effective classroom practice.

This session aims to share some of the issues that retrieval practice research raises for teachers and discusses some key consideration for teachers who already use or want to use retrieval-based strategies in their practice. Drawing on findings from two recent research projects, the concept of retrieval-based learning will be outlined, along with key ideas to support the development of effective and efficient strategies.

The OCR Science team will outline recent progress we have made in helping teachers to improve representation in the science classroom. We'll look at how teachers can help their students to their develop STEM identity. We will highlight our resources to help teachers to meet the Gatsby Careers benchmarks.